BREAKING🚨 Trump is threatening new strikes on Iran’s power plants and bridges.

Oritrend blog Trump is threatening new strikes on Iran’s power plants and bridges if Tehran doesn’t take his deal before the ceasefire ends tomorrow.

In a fresh round of comments, the president made clear he does not want to prolong the three‑week ceasefire that paused the 2026 Iran war. Speaking to CNBC, he said it’s “highly unlikely” he’ll agree to any extension, even if negotiators in Pakistan make progress on a peace framework. 

“They have to negotiate,” he said. “Iran can get themselves in a very good footing if they make a deal. They can make themselves into a strong nation again, a wonderful nation again.” The flip side of that pitch is his threat: if they don’t sign, “lots of bombs” start going off.

Politico’s piece lays out what those bombs might hit. Trump has spent days dangling the prospect of strikes on civilian infrastructure — explicitly mentioning power plants, bridges, and transportation nodes — on top of the Revolutionary Guard bases and missile depots already hit in February and March. 

He insists those targets are “military” because Iran uses bridges and roads to move weapons. Human rights groups and legal experts say deliberately taking down dual‑use civilian infrastructure on that scale would shred what’s left of U.S. claims to be acting within international law.

The other flashpoint is the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s oil.

When the ceasefire was first announced, both sides trumpeted an agreement to reopen the strait. Iran said it would ease its Revolutionary Guard chokehold. The U.S. said it would allow some shipping to move. 

For a brief moment, tankers started creeping back into the channel. Within days, that “breakthrough” fell apart. Trump insisted the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian oil would remain in place. Tehran responded by tightening its own grip, harassing ships and threatening any vessel seen as aligned with Washington or its allies.

Trump has now accused Iran of striking multiple European ships in the strait — something Tehran denies — and the U.S. Navy has seized the Touska, an Iranian‑flagged cargo ship Washington says was trying to evade the blockade. Each seizure and boarding becomes both a bargaining chip and another reason hardliners in Tehran argue against any deal.

Publicly, Trump is selling his approach as tough love. On Truth Social over the weekend, he called his offer to Iran a “very fair and reasonable DEAL” and claimed that if Tehran accepts it, “the war will be over in less than 24 hours.” 

In the same posts, he warned that if Iran refuses, he’ll order strikes that will “hurt them militarily” and economically, suggesting that “a whole civilization” could face consequences it has “never seen before.”

Behind the scenes, diplomats are scrambling. Vice President J.D. Vance is expected in Pakistan for a second round of indirect talks. Pakistani officials say Iran’s decision on sending a delegation is “still pending,” and Iranian officials are publicly blasting the U.S. for violating the ceasefire with naval actions while saying they’re open to talks conducted with “courtesy and respect.” 

The basic gap hasn’t changed: the U.S. wants Iran to accept a long freeze on uranium enrichment and strict limits on missiles and regional militias; Iran wants sanctions relief, a phased approach, and guarantees Trump won’t rip up any deal the moment it becomes politically inconvenient.

All of that is happening under a clock that Trump set himself.

He keeps repeating that time is on his side — that sanctions, blockades, and the destruction from earlier strikes will force Iran to cave. But time is working on another level too. 

Every day of uncertainty pushes up risk premiums in energy markets, raises shipping costs through the Gulf, and increases pressure from Europe and Asian importers to stabilize the situation. European leaders are already warning that another full‑scale bombing campaign will send oil and gas prices soaring again just as inflation is starting to cool.

Politically, Trump is threading a narrower and narrower needle.

He campaigned in 2016 and 2020 as the guy who would end “endless wars,” and he still insists this conflict is about preventing a bigger one later by stopping Iran’s nuclear program. 

But the reality in 2026 is a grinding, open‑ended confrontation that has already seen massive strikes on Iranian territory, retaliatory attacks on U.S. bases, and the effective militarization of one of the world’s most important shipping lanes. At home, veterans are getting arrested in the Capitol for protesting the war, and polls show deep skepticism about another major Middle Eastern campaign.

In that context, dangling peace and punishment in the same breath is as much about domestic politics as it is about Tehran.

If Iran swallows his terms, Trump can claim he forced a proud, defiant enemy to bend — proof, he’ll say, that maximum pressure works. If Iran walks away or simply runs out the clock, he’ll argue he was “forced” to resume bombing because they refused a generous offer. 

Either way, he’s trying to position himself as the only one willing to be both ruthless enough to bomb and “savvy” enough to close a deal.

For people in Iran and the region, the nuance doesn’t matter as much as the timing.

They’re watching the same countdown everyone else is — to Wednesday evening, when the ceasefire runs out. They know Trump has already shown he’s willing to hit deep inside Iranian territory. 

They know Iran’s own leaders are under pressure from hardliners who would rather absorb another round of strikes than sign something that looks like capitulation.

Trump is betting that fear of those strikes will carry the day.

The next 24 hours will show whether that bet brings a deal — or puts the region right back where it was before the ceasefire, only with more anger, more mistrust, and more wreckage to build back from.

See more......sign up